Thursday 18 December 2014
Tuesday 16 December 2014
Monday 15 December 2014
Saturday 13 December 2014
V-HACD 2.0 Parameters Description
Parameter name | Description | Default value | Range |
---|---|---|---|
resolution | maximum number of voxels generated during the voxelization stage | 100,000 | 10,000-64,000,000 |
depth | maximum number of clipping stages. During each split stage, all the model parts (with a concavity higher than the user defined threshold) are clipped according the "best" clipping plane | 20 | 1-32 |
concavity | maximum concavity | 0.0025 | 0.0-1.0 |
planeDownsampling | controls the granularity of the search for the "best" clipping plane | 4 | 1-16 |
convexhullDownsampling | controls the precision of the convex-hull generation process during the clipping plane selection stage | 4 | 1-16 |
alpha | controls the bias toward clipping along symmetry planes | 0.05 | 0.0-1.0 |
beta | controls the bias toward clipping along revolution axes | 0.05 | 0.0-1.0 |
gamma | maximum allowed concavity during the merge stage | 0.00125 | 0.0-1.0 |
pca | enable/disable normalizing the mesh before applying the convex decomposition | 0 | 0-1 |
mode | 0: voxel-based approximate convex decomposition, 1: tetrahedron-based approximate convex decomposition | 0 | 0-1 |
maxNumVerticesPerCH | controls the maximum number of triangles per convex-hull | 64 | 4-1024 |
minVolumePerCH | controls the adaptive sampling of the generated convex-hulls | 0.0001 | 0.0-0.01 |
Sunday 7 December 2014
V-HACD 2.0 vs. HACD
Below some approximate convex decomposition results comparing V-HACD 2.0 and HACD.
Parameters:
- testVHACD.exe %%i 8000000 20 0.003 4 4 0.05 0.05 0.0015 0 0 256 0.0 %%i.wrl log_%%i.txt
- testHACD.exe %%i 2 50 0 0 1 30 2000
- +1: V-HACD provides better decomposition than HACD
- -1: HACD provides better decomposition than V-HACD
- 0: V-HACD and HACD provide comparable results
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)